[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#10974: address@hidden
|
From: |
Andy Wingo |
|
Subject: |
bug#10974: address@hidden |
|
Date: |
Tue, 03 Jul 2012 01:17:54 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
On Tue 03 Jul 2012 00:35, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> Would this be "fixed" if we changed these to be implemented as inline
>> functions?
>
> In some way, though their address could still not be taken.
Sorry to be obtuse, but with our inline functions, we also residualize a
concrete instantiation (via the inline.c madness). Does that not work?
A
--
http://wingolog.org/