[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#18583: possibly buggy top level behavior in master
From: |
Daniel Llorens |
Subject: |
bug#18583: possibly buggy top level behavior in master |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:24:31 +0200 |
The following code:
(define-syntax define-lues
(syntax-rules ()
((_ () exp)
(call-with-values (lambda () exp) (lambda () 'unspecified)))
((_ (var . vars) exp)
(begin
(define var (call-with-values (lambda () exp) list))
(define-lues vars (apply values (cdr var)))
(define var (car var))))
((_ var exp)
(define var (call-with-values (lambda () exp) list)))))
(define-lues (a) (values (make-vector 3 9)))
(vector-length a)
In 2.0, either pasting this in the REPL or (load "...") a file
containing this produces the expected result, 3.
In the current master (f7582), pasting in the REPL produces the
same result, but loading from a file this produces the error:
> In procedure vector-ref: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting
> vector): (#(9 9 9))
I'm aware of the workarounds, I'm reporting the behavior itself.
Regards,
Daniel
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#18583: possibly buggy top level behavior in master,
Daniel Llorens <=