[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 'python-build-system'
From: |
Nikita Karetnikov |
Subject: |
Re: 'python-build-system' |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:50:24 +0400 |
> Yes, definitely. But that’s not a problem: these scripts are most
> likely unused during the build process and afterward.
So, should I package it (without replacing shells)?
>> * guix/build/utils.scm (wrap-program): Assume that 'prog' is an
>> absolute filename. Adjust 'prog-real' and 'prog-tmp' accordingly.
>> Also, change 'prog-tmp' to honor command line arguments.
> What was wrong with the previous approach? I don’t like the “assume
> it’s an absolute file name” bit, because we don’t know whether the
> assumption holds.
Well, have a look at this snippet:
+ (for-each (cut wrap-program <> var)
+ files)))
Each 'file' here will have an absolute filename.
I failed to make it work with the previous version.
Should I change the commit message?
> You need double quotes around address@hidden
Why should I add them?
> You also need to keep (package-native-search-paths python). See commit
> 35ac56b6, which fixed that for Perl & co.
Could you elaborate? Why is it needed? Is it necessary to add
'python-search-paths'?
pgpVrldcLocW0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: 'python-build-system', Ludovic Courtès, 2013/04/27
Re: 'python-build-system', Ludovic Courtès, 2013/04/29
Re: 'python-build-system', Ludovic Courtès, 2013/04/30
Re: 'python-build-system', Cyril Roelandt, 2013/04/28
Re: 'python-build-system', Ludovic Courtès, 2013/04/29
Re: 'python-build-system', Cyril Roelandt, 2013/04/29
Re: 'python-build-system', Nikita Karetnikov, 2013/04/30