[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version? |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:27:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Mathieu Lirzin <address@hidden> skribis:
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
>> Regarding the aesthetics, I’d be in favor of using @ for the version:
>
> You mean like npm... :)
Possibly, but I’m not that proficient at npm. ;-) I think I’ve seen
another tool use that convention, though I don’t remember which one
(maybe Spack?).
It’s more that address@hidden reads like “Guile at [version] 1.8.”
>> address@hidden
>> address@hidden:doc
>>
>> I’m not sure if we should also allow:
>>
>> guile:address@hidden
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> I'm OK with that. Since choosing the reserved characters is not a
> technical decision, maybe we could poll users?
Yes, why not (bikeshedding ahead! :-)). Would you like to email
guix-devel about it?
Note that it only affects the CLI. The Emacs and Web UIs won’t see any
difference.
Ludo’.
- bug#19219: Package names with digits following dashes, (continued)
- bug#19219: Package names with digits following dashes, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/10
- bug#19219: Package names with digits following dashes, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/12/21
- bug#19219: Package names with digits following dashes, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/21
- bug#19219: Package names with digits following dashes, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/12/22
- bug#19219: Package names with digits following dashes, Alex Kost, 2015/12/23
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/30
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/12/30
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?, Leo Famulari, 2015/12/30
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?, Efraim Flashner, 2015/12/31
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?, Alex Kost, 2015/12/31
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?, Christopher Allan Webber, 2015/12/31