bug#31190: Ansible doesn't build

[Marius Bakke]

Jelle Licht <address@hidden> writes:

> 2018-04-17 22:56 GMT+02:00 Marius Bakke <address@hidden>:
>
>> Jelle Licht <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > From f770998d0f0b56180e0c9a12f0946a77d7ff61a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Jelle Licht <address@hidden>
>> > Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 21:31:05 +0200
>> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ansible: Add missing inputs
>> >
>> > * gnu/packages/admin.scm (ansible)[native-inputs]: Add python2-bcrypt and
>> >   python2-pynacl.
>> > ---
>> >  gnu/packages/admin.scm | 5 ++++-
>> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/admin.scm b/gnu/packages/admin.scm
>> > index aed997e5b..07401af72 100644
>> > --- a/gnu/packages/admin.scm
>> > +++ b/gnu/packages/admin.scm
>> > @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
>> >    #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config)
>> >    #:use-module (gnu packages popt)
>> >    #:use-module (gnu packages python)
>> > +  #:use-module (gnu packages password-utils)
>> >    #:use-module (gnu packages python-crypto)
>> >    #:use-module (gnu packages python-web)
>> >    #:use-module (gnu packages terminals)
>>
>> This introduces a circular dependency between (gnu packages admin) and
>> (gnu packages password-utils).  Perhaps we should move python-bcrypt to
>> python-crypto.scm.  Thoughts?
>>
>
> Makes sense to me. The `python-py-bcrypt' package is already located there
> so it would make sense to have similar packages in the same place.

I went ahead and did this in 7c16af4646fac789000495064a13284691dbeb75.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature