bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#31190: Ansible doesn't build


From: Roel Janssen
Subject: bug#31190: Ansible doesn't build
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 22:16:11 +0200
User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 25.3.1

Clément Lassieur <address@hidden> writes:

> For the record, patches about it have been sent to guix-patches as well:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/2018-04/msg00332.html.

Right. I didn't see these.  You can ignore mine then.


>
> Marius Bakke <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Jelle Licht <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> 2018-04-17 22:56 GMT+02:00 Marius Bakke <address@hidden>:
>>>
>>>> Jelle Licht <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>
>>>> > From f770998d0f0b56180e0c9a12f0946a77d7ff61a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>> > From: Jelle Licht <address@hidden>
>>>> > Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 21:31:05 +0200
>>>> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ansible: Add missing inputs
>>>> >
>>>> > * gnu/packages/admin.scm (ansible)[native-inputs]: Add python2-bcrypt and
>>>> >   python2-pynacl.
>>>> > ---
>>>> >  gnu/packages/admin.scm | 5 ++++-
>>>> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>> >
>>>> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/admin.scm b/gnu/packages/admin.scm
>>>> > index aed997e5b..07401af72 100644
>>>> > --- a/gnu/packages/admin.scm
>>>> > +++ b/gnu/packages/admin.scm
>>>> > @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
>>>> >    #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config)
>>>> >    #:use-module (gnu packages popt)
>>>> >    #:use-module (gnu packages python)
>>>> > +  #:use-module (gnu packages password-utils)
>>>> >    #:use-module (gnu packages python-crypto)
>>>> >    #:use-module (gnu packages python-web)
>>>> >    #:use-module (gnu packages terminals)
>>>>
>>>> This introduces a circular dependency between (gnu packages admin) and
>>>> (gnu packages password-utils).  Perhaps we should move python-bcrypt to
>>>> python-crypto.scm.  Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Makes sense to me. The `python-py-bcrypt' package is already located there
>>> so it would make sense to have similar packages in the same place.
>>
>> I went ahead and did this in 7c16af4646fac789000495064a13284691dbeb75.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]