[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#71870: Some broken Go packages (including Podman)
From: |
Nils Landt |
Subject: |
bug#71870: Some broken Go packages (including Podman) |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:20:42 +0200 (CEST) |
> jgart <jgart@dismail.de> hat am 01.07.2024 19:04 CEST geschrieben:
>
>
> > No, the patch submission process is too annoying for me.
> >
>
> Hi Nils,
>
> Sorry to hear that. I can relate to that as I've also been annoyed by aspects
> of the process.
>
> Can you share some of the pain points that you've experienced with the patch
> submission process?
>
> This will help us potentially address that and open discussion around it.
>
> How do you think that the patch submission process can be improved?
Nothing that hasn't been talked about for years, really.
- Patch submission workflow without email
- Code review tool with threaded at-code conversations
- Code formatter that I can make work for vim (i.e. guix style for non-packages)
- Useful commit messages instead of GNU ChangeLog
My previous attempt at contribution (https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66557) was
quite unpleasant.
I don't know how to phrase my critique of the reviewers in a constructive
manner, given that I respect we're all human beings volunteering time for this
hobby.
> I'm going to give a talk in August at the Guix London meetup on patch review,
> the mumi CLI tool, and my current personal workflow.
I will be watching the recording, but I don't see how it would address my
wishlist :)