[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd state
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd state |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:08:29 +0100 |
I meant the installation guide should be updated. However, since
the tarball still exists, it shouldn't be updated the way I
expected, but by changing alpha.gnu.org to ftp.gnuab.org. I guess
it's still a good idea to mention crosshurd anyway.
Okie, anyone who would like to update the Debian GNU/Hurd installation
guide located at http://www.debian.org/ports/hurd?
The problem would be the same as long as the files are not in /lib.
Unioning would be the preferred solution IMO, so Debian should
probably do that as well. Or are there reasons not to do that?
Debian could union /X11R6 in /lib, yes. Don't think that there are
any reasons or policies against it.
- Re: Hurd state, (continued)
- Re: Hurd state, Bas Wijnen, 2005/01/06
- Re: Hurd state, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/06
- Re: Hurd state, Bas Wijnen, 2005/01/06
- Re: Hurd state, Philip Charles, 2005/01/06
- Re: Hurd state, Oliver Beck, 2005/01/06
- Re: Hurd state, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/06
- Re: Hurd state, Marco Gerards, 2005/01/06
- Re: Hurd state, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/06
- Re: Hurd state, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/06
- Re: Hurd state, Bas Wijnen, 2005/01/06
- Re: Hurd state,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
Re: Hurd state, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/01/06