[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A Hurd release
From: |
Ayden |
Subject: |
Re: A Hurd release |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:32:12 -0900 |
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 12:52 +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Releasing something that's buggy where the developers don't realize
> it, makes it aggravating.
>
> This is impossible to achive, no release is bug free. And all
> maintainers that make releases know that what they release contains
> bugs, somewhere.
Of course, but denying the fact that they are there doesn't help
anybody. Nobody is saying test it extensively to find bugs, just main
things that don't work.
>
> At lease with a bug list, it cuts down on the confusion. With a bug
> list, people know what to expect.
>
> Known bugs should be fixed before a release, then when people find
> bugs after the release, they report them, and they get fixed. And a
> bug-fix release is made.
>
If you try to fix all the bugs before a the release, then by your logic,
the software would never be released. You have to start somewhere.
> Cheers.
>
- Re: A Hurd release, (continued)
- Re: A Hurd release, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/07
- Re: A Hurd release, Marco Gerards, 2005/01/07
- Re: A Hurd release, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/01/11
- Re: A Hurd release, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: A Hurd release, Ognyan Kulev, 2005/01/12
- Re: A Hurd release, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/07
- Re: A Hurd release, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/01/07
- Re: A Hurd release, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/07
- Re: A Hurd release, Rian Hunter, 2005/01/08
- Re: A Hurd release, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/08
- Re: A Hurd release,
Ayden <=
Re: A Hurd release, Harley D. Eades III, 2005/01/05