Re: RPC user stub libraries

[Thomas Schwinge]

Hello!

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 02:06:21PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> >   * What's the reason for having a libmachuser / libhurduser be part of
> >    glibc?

> Given the need for the libraries, they have to be built somewhere.

Obviously.  :-)

> you still need the function to exist, so
> that people can take the address of it.

But: that's the part I'm wondering about.  In which places in the source
code is this actually needed, and couldn't easily be rewritten to cope
with inlined RPC stubs?


Regards,
 Thomas

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature