[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sleep in microsecond or nanosecond
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: sleep in microsecond or nanosecond |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:07:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net, le Fri 13 Aug 2010 08:42:33 +0200, a écrit :
> I think improving the timeout granularity in general would be rather
> complicated, and make little sense...
Improving the timeout granularity for even just one case is most of the
work: programming e.g. the HPET timer, managing wake-ups, etc. Plugging
that to the usual kernel timeout functions should really be trivial
after that.
Samuel
- Re: sleep in microsecond or nanosecond, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/08/11
- Re: sleep in microsecond or nanosecond, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2010/08/11
- Re: sleep in microsecond or nanosecond, Samuel Thibault, 2010/08/13
- Re: sleep in microsecond or nanosecond, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/08/13
- Re: sleep in microsecond or nanosecond, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2010/08/13
- Re: sleep in microsecond or nanosecond, Da Zheng, 2010/08/16
- Re: sleep in microsecond or nanosecond, Samuel Thibault, 2010/08/16
- Re: sleep in microsecond or nanosecond, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2010/08/16
- Re: sleep in microsecond or nanosecond,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: sleep in microsecond or nanosecond, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/08/18