[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUnet News: vfork and the signal race
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: GNUnet News: vfork and the signal race |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Nov 2011 15:18:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Samuel Thibault, le Sat 26 Nov 2011 15:14:11 +0100, a écrit :
> Richard Braun, le Sat 26 Nov 2011 15:12:50 +0100, a écrit :
> > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:35:29AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > (Naturally, the result would be non-portable for systems where
> > > > fork==vfork,
> > > > but then maybe implementing vfork as fork is the bug? ;-))
> > >
> > > It's what the norm says.
> >
> > I think you meant the norm explicitely says vfork can be implemented as
> > fork.
>
> Yes, which is sufficient for what you said.
I meant what *he* said.
Samuel
- Re: GNUnet News: vfork and the signal race, Thomas Schwinge, 2011/11/25
- Re: GNUnet News: vfork and the signal race, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2011/11/25
- Re: GNUnet News: vfork and the signal race, Christian Grothoff, 2011/11/26
- Re: GNUnet News: vfork and the signal race, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2011/11/25
- Re: GNUnet News: vfork and the signal race, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2011/11/25
- Re: GNUnet News: vfork and the signal race, Christian Grothoff, 2011/11/26
- Re: GNUnet News: vfork and the signal race, Thomas Schwinge, 2011/11/26
- Re: GNUnet News: vfork and the signal race, Samuel Thibault, 2011/11/26
- Re: GNUnet News: vfork and the signal race, Richard Braun, 2011/11/26
- Re: GNUnet News: vfork and the signal race, Samuel Thibault, 2011/11/26
- Re: GNUnet News: vfork and the signal race,
Samuel Thibault <=