[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH,HURD] hurdselect: Step1, code split preparations
|
From: |
Richard Braun |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH,HURD] hurdselect: Step1, code split preparations |
|
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jan 2013 21:13:56 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 08:40:11PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > theorically, poll could be fixed also without restructing hurdselect...
>
> We have discussed this issue before. Let's see what others say.
Minimizing the amount of code change looks better to me. We could however
isolate the respective specific code in helper functions.
--
Richard Braun
- Re: [PATCH,HURD] hurdselect: Step1, code split preparations, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH,HURD] hurdselect: Step1, code split preparations, Svante Signell, 2013/01/22
- Re: [PATCH,HURD] hurdselect: Step1, code split preparations, Samuel Thibault, 2013/01/22
- Re: [PATCH,HURD] hurdselect: Step1, code split preparations, Svante Signell, 2013/01/23
- Re: [PATCH,HURD] hurdselect: Step1, code split preparations (version 3), Svante Signell, 2013/01/24
- Re: [PATCH,HURD] hurdselect: Step1, code split preparations (version 3), Richard Braun, 2013/01/24
- Re: [PATCH,HURD][RFC] hurdselect: Step2, code split finished, Svante Signell, 2013/01/24
Re: [PATCH,HURD] hurdselect: Step1, code split preparations, Pino Toscano, 2013/01/22
- Re: [PATCH,HURD] hurdselect: Step1, code split preparations, Svante Signell, 2013/01/22
- Re: [PATCH,HURD] hurdselect: Step1, code split preparations, Samuel Thibault, 2013/01/22
- Re: [PATCH,HURD] hurdselect: Step1, code split preparations, Svante Signell, 2013/01/22
- Re: [PATCH,HURD] hurdselect: Step1, code split preparations,
Richard Braun <=
- Re: [PATCH,HURD] hurdselect: Step1, code split preparations, Pino Toscano, 2013/01/22
- Re: [PATCH,HURD] hurdselect: Step1, code split preparations, Richard Braun, 2013/01/24