[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks |
Date: |
Mon, 9 May 2016 00:42:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Agustina Arzille, on Fri 06 May 2016 23:19:20 -0300, wrote:
> I run it with "kvm -m 512 -hda debian-hurd-20160325.img", because I had heard
> mixed things about writeback cache. I'll try a build again with that option.
512M is not so much, perhaps use more as Richard suggested.
> >>+/* Gsync flags. */
> >>+#define GSYNC_SHARED 0x01
> >>+#define GSYNC_QUAD 0x02
> >>+#define GSYNC_TIMED 0x04
> >>+#define GSYNC_BROADCAST 0x08
> >>+#define GSYNC_MUTATE 0x10
> >Don't we install a mach header to define these? If not yet, we really
> >should.
>
> Well, in mach/gnumach.h, there's only the prototypes.
I mean perhaps installing gsync.h into mach/gsync.h, like other such
headers.
Samuel
Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, 2016/05/09
Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Samuel Thibault, 2016/05/13