[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH gnumach] interrupt: Mask, eoi, unmask
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH gnumach] interrupt: Mask, eoi, unmask |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Oct 2023 02:02:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Samuel Thibault, le lun. 02 oct. 2023 01:43:48 +0200, a ecrit:
> Also, "don't EOI in the user handlers anymore.", isn't that already the
> case?
Ah, that's the irqtab.irqdev_ack call in irq_acknowledge.
Then I'd say we should try to move it to queue_intr? So that it's done
before the driver manages the hardware (possibly generating another
irq).
Samuel
- [PATCH gnumach] interrupt: Mask, eoi, unmask, Damien Zammit, 2023/10/01
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] interrupt: Mask, eoi, unmask, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/01
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] interrupt: Mask, eoi, unmask, Damien Zammit, 2023/10/01
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] interrupt: Mask, eoi, unmask, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/01
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] interrupt: Mask, eoi, unmask, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/01
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] interrupt: Mask, eoi, unmask, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/01
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] interrupt: Mask, eoi, unmask, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/01
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] interrupt: Mask, eoi, unmask, Damien Zammit, 2023/10/01
- Re: [PATCH gnumach] interrupt: Mask, eoi, unmask,
Samuel Thibault <=