Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Port qemu to GNU/Hurd

[Manolo de Medici]

Thank you, I see that there is an issue and I'll take care of fixing
it in the future

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 5:53 PM Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 at 16:02, Manolo de Medici <manolodemedici@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Recently, a testsuite for gnumach, the GNU/Hurd microkernel, was developed
> > that uses qemu. Currently qemu cannot be compiled for the GNU/Hurd, as such,
> > this testsuite is available only for GNU/Linux users.
> >
> > This patcheset allows qemu compilation in GNU/Hurd. With this patchset 
> > applied,
> > qemu can be compiled without any special configure options.
> >
> > Please review, thanks,
> >
> > Manolo de Medici (4):
> >   Include new arbitrary limits if not already defined
> >   Avoid conflicting types for 'copy_file_range'
> >   Add the GNU/Hurd as a target host
> >   Exclude TPM ioctls definitions for the GNU/Hurd
>
> Hi -- something odd seems to have happened with these patchset
> emails. The cover letter got to the list:
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/CAHP40m=UQ=F1-Vy4-wR18RjqzF9o+8UOjgpUsrTU8QXn=7eAeA@mail.gmail.com/
>
> but it doesn't have any of the patches as followup emails
> in the thread. Instead they got sent as entirely separate
> emails, eg here's patch 1:
> CAHP40mmk4cPk6ZHETfq5BtQxK63A6PiuCKrvv4yyOPBxVTW+OQ@mail.gmail.com/">https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/CAHP40mmk4cPk6ZHETfq5BtQxK63A6PiuCKrvv4yyOPBxVTW+OQ@mail.gmail.com/
>
> This means the automated patch tooling thinks none of the patches
> arrived, eg patchew says "0 patches received":
> CAHP40mmk4cPk6ZHETfq5BtQxK63A6PiuCKrvv4yyOPBxVTW+OQ@mail.gmail.com/">https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/CAHP40mmk4cPk6ZHETfq5BtQxK63A6PiuCKrvv4yyOPBxVTW+OQ@mail.gmail.com/
>
> git format-patch can help in getting this right (it is its
> "--thread=shallow" style).
>
> For this version, I'll send some review comments to the
> individual patch emails, but it would be nice to get this
> right on v3.
>
> thanks
> -- PMM