[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:39:45 +0200 |
David Boyce wrote:
> You say GNUMAKEFLAGS+=-r is "invalid syntax" but I don't know quite how to
> read that. It's not invalid in the sense of causing an error, it's just
> that it would be invisible to any non-GNU make program
Indeed, sorry. You're right. I confused it with the := assignment operator.
Bruno
- Re: GNU make troubleshooting, (continued)
- Re: GNU make troubleshooting, Bruno Haible, 2023/07/15
- Re: GNU make troubleshooting, Dmitry Goncharov, 2023/07/15
- Re: GNU make troubleshooting, Bruno Haible, 2023/07/15
- Re: GNU make troubleshooting, David Boyce, 2023/07/15
- Re: GNU make troubleshooting, Dmitry Goncharov, 2023/07/16
- Re: GNU make troubleshooting, Bruno Haible, 2023/07/17
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, Bruno Haible, 2023/07/17
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, David Boyce, 2023/07/17
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, Bruno Haible, 2023/07/17
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, David Boyce, 2023/07/17
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, Dmitry Goncharov, 2023/07/18
- Re: MAKEFLAGS=-r, Paul Smith, 2023/07/17
- Re: disabling the built-in rules, Bruno Haible, 2023/07/17
- Re: disabling the built-in rules, Paul Smith, 2023/07/17
- Re: disabling the built-in rules, Bruno Haible, 2023/07/17
- Re: disabling the built-in rules, Paul Smith, 2023/07/17
- Re: disabling the built-in rules, Alejandro Colomar, 2023/07/17
- Re: disabling the built-in rules, Paul Smith, 2023/07/17
- Re: disabling the built-in rules, Dmitry Goncharov, 2023/07/18
- Re: disabling the built-in rules, Alejandro Colomar, 2023/07/19