[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: New conditional assignm ent facility
From: |
rsbecker |
Subject: |
RE: New conditional assignm ent facility |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jan 2024 09:07:03 -0500 |
On Monday, January 29, 2024 5:18 AM, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>rsbecker@nexbridge.com (27 January 2024 23:45) wrote:
>> My take on it is that +:= (because of the : ) means that you have to
resolve
>everything at that point.
>
>Surely it could equally mean: fully expand the right-hand side immediately,
append
>to the left-hand variable, preserving its type if set, else making it
immediate. Then,
>if it was previously deferred-evaluation, its prior value remains
deferred-evaluated -
>only the part appended is evaluated right away.
I think we are saying the same thing.
- Re: New conditional assignment facility, (continued)
- Re: New conditional assignment facility, Paul Smith, 2024/01/27
- RE: New conditional assignm ent facility, rsbecker, 2024/01/27
- Re: New conditional assignm ent facility, Paul Smith, 2024/01/27
- RE: New conditional assignm ent facility, rsbecker, 2024/01/27
- New append operators (was: Re: New conditional assignment facility), Paul Smith, 2024/01/28
- RE: New append operators (was: Re: New conditional assignment facility), rsbecker, 2024/01/28
- Re: New append operators (was: Re: New conditional assignment facility), Paul Smith, 2024/01/28
- Re: New conditional assignm ent facility, Edward Welbourne, 2024/01/29
- RE: New conditional assignm ent facility,
rsbecker <=
- Re: New conditional assignment facility, Edward Welbourne, 2024/01/29
Re: New conditional assignment facility, Alejandro Colomar, 2024/01/11