Re: gcc bug causes parted to write bad GPT entries

[Andrew Clausen]

On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 01:14:13AM +0000, Richard Hirst wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 12:01:17PM +1100, Andrew Clausen wrote:
> > Anyway, I don't trust compilers, unless some language lawyer can
> > prove that it will always work without ((packed)).
> 
> Well, I could put ((packed)) if gcc was 3.1 or better, assuming my tests
> are successful.

Are gcc 2.x and 3.0 still maintained?

I would have thought the solution would be to release bug-fix
updates for them.

> > BTW, what is the bug exactly?
> 
>  [snip]

Thanks for the explanation :)
Andrew