Re: move 5 xxx.xx End?

[Andrew Clausen]

On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 02:30:43PM +0800, Mathias Koerber wrote:
> >>(parted) move 5 8291.360
> >>End?
> >
> >Ooops, I'm not sure why the docs say this.  Maybe I was planning
> >to implement it (!)  Anyway, I'm not sure it's a good idea.
> 
> Ok. So should i used my calculated end-point of 9789.578
> or do I have to take into account any additional
> information?

No extra info... remember, if what you try won't work, Parted will
try to find the closest thing that will.

Cheers,
Andrew