[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How about simply include files?
From: |
Sven Luther |
Subject: |
Re: How about simply include files? |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 11:09:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 10:43:16AM +1100, Andrew Clausen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:57:07AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > If it fails, i have in the past proposed to open an alioth project,
> > and have the parted source in a subversion or arch repository there.
>
> I have never used either, but have a mild preference for arch.
I have never used arch, but am using subversion for ocaml related
packages in debian. I hear arch is nicer because it allows for separate
remote repositories and such, a bit like bitkeeper.
That said, there may also be dangers of going from a single repository a
la CVS or subversion, to a dispersed one for arch or bitkeeper.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
- How about simply include files?, Mathieu Bruneau, 2004/01/21
- Re: How about simply include files?, Sven Luther, 2004/01/22
- Re: How about simply include files?, Andrew Clausen, 2004/01/22
- Re: How about simply include files?, Stewart Smith, 2004/01/25
- Re: How about simply include files?, Sven Luther, 2004/01/25
- Re: How about simply include files?, Andrew Clausen, 2004/01/25
- Re: How about simply include files?, ROunofF, 2004/01/25
- Re: How about simply include files?, Sven Luther, 2004/01/26
- Re: How about simply include files?, Stewart Smith, 2004/01/26