[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff) |
Date: |
Sun, 4 Jul 2004 01:02:04 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 03:40:01PM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > XP home edition (the green box)
>
> Hm, I only ever tried XP Pro.
I guess we can try diff'ing the bootstrap code. Should probably do this
in private for copyright reasons...
> > > Does it use NTFS as both the boot and system drive?
> >
> > I am using a single NTFS partition.
>
> I have lots of partitions (mostly Linux, NTFS is at end of disk).
If NTFS is at the end of the disk, doesn't it have to use LBA to address
it?
> > Note: I reversed-engineered the Windows FAT bootstrap code. My analysis
> > is contained in the file doc/FAT in the Parted source distribution. I
> > concluded that Windows uses LBA if the LBA flag is set in the boot
> > partition table entry. (i.e. the partition type includes LBA in the
> > fdisk codes - this corresponds to a bit being set)
>
> Interesting. Maybe I don't have this bit set?
This bit only applies to FAT, AFAIK. There is no corresponding bit
for NTFS.
> > > u16 sectors_per_track; /* Required to boot Windows. */
> > > u16 heads; /* Required to boot Windows. */
> > > u32 hidden_sectors; /* Offset to the start of the partition relative
> > > to the disk in sectors. Required to boot Windows. */
> >
> > I just set the first 2 of these fields to 0, and everything still works.
> > Am I blessed? (Or perhaps cursed!)
>
> Odd. Messing up any of the above three values makes my XP Pro fail to
> boot!
Interesting. How is your BIOS configured? (LBA, Auto, CHS or Large?
what CHS values?)
Cheers,
Andrew
- Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics, (continued)
- Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff), Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, 2004/07/02
- Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff), Andrew Clausen, 2004/07/02
- Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff), Szakacsits Szabolcs, 2004/07/02
- Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff), Patrick J. LoPresti, 2004/07/03
- Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff), Andrew Clausen, 2004/07/02
- Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff), Anton Altaparmakov, 2004/07/03
- Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff), Andrew Clausen, 2004/07/03
- Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff), Anton Altaparmakov, 2004/07/03
- Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff),
Andrew Clausen <=
- Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff), Patrick J. LoPresti, 2004/07/03
- Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff), Anton Altaparmakov, 2004/07/02
Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff), Andrew Clausen, 2004/07/02
- Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff), Andries Brouwer, 2004/07/03
- Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff), Patrick J. LoPresti, 2004/07/03
- Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff), Andrew Clausen, 2004/07/03
- Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff), Patrick J. LoPresti, 2004/07/03
- Re: [RFC] Restoring HDIO_GETGEO semantics (was: Re: workaround for BIOS / CHS stuff), Andries Brouwer, 2004/07/03