Re: [bug-recutils] A new field type?

[OLLIER Jean-François]

Would you consider using the dot notation in the records chain notation?
I.e. If many records recursively reference other records, we may find this:
 record1:field_depth1:field_depth2:value that could be replaced with:
 record1.field_depth1.field_depth2.value 

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 07:30:54PM +0100, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
> 
> I am reconsidering the usage of compound field names for making
> references. ...
> We can reserve the compound field names to implement some other facility
> in the future.
> 
> -- 
> Jose E. Marchesi    address@hidden
> GNU Project         http://www.gnu.org

-- 
Jean-François OLLIER
mailto:address@hidden