[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split
|
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
|
Subject: |
Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split |
|
Date: |
Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:55:14 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 03:05:02PM -0800, Karl Berry wrote:
> - provide a new command line option --link-prefix that allows the user to
> force some prefix for relative links
>
> My initial reaction is that it would be better as a configuration
> variable than a command line option.
I have done that, called IMAGE_LINK_PREFIX.
--
Pat
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, (continued)
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Karl Berry, 2012/02/04
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/04
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Karl Berry, 2012/02/04
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/04
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/04
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/05
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Vincent Belaïche, 2012/02/05
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Patrice Dumas, 2012/02/05
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Karl Berry, 2012/02/05
Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split, Karl Berry, 2012/02/04
- Re: [bug #35395] bad picture path with --html and --without --no-split,
Patrice Dumas <=