[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH 09/25] Enforce Metalink file name verification, st
From: |
Tim Ruehsen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH 09/25] Enforce Metalink file name verification, strip directory if necessary |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:21:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/5.2.3 (Linux/4.7.0-1-amd64; KDE/5.25.0; x86_64; ; ) |
On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:08:30 PM CEST Matthew White wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 09:29:27 +0200
>
> Tim Ruehsen <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 5:13:10 AM CEST Matthew White wrote:
> > > On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 21:20:54 +0200
> > >
> > > Tim Rühsen <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > On Montag, 12. September 2016 20:18:30 CEST Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > > > > From: Tim Ruehsen <address@hidden>
> > > > > > Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:00:32 +0200
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > + char *basename = name;
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > + while ((name = strstr (basename, "/")))
> > > > > > > + basename = name + 1;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could you use strrchr() ? something like
> > > > > >
> > > > > > char *basename = strrchr (name, '/');
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if (basename)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > basename += 1;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > else
> > > > > >
> > > > > > basename = name;
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we want to use ISSEP, no? Otherwise Windows file names with
> > > > > backslashes will misfire.
> > > >
> > > > Good point. What about device names ?
> > > >
> > > > So maybe base_name() from Gnulib module 'dirname' is the right choice
> > > > !?
> > > > See https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/basename.html
> > >
> > > What if Gnulib's base_name() returns "./<basename>"?
> > >
> > > libmetalink's metalink_check_safe_path() rejects relative paths:
> > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5854#section-4.1.2.1
> > >
> > > Also, basename is used to point to an existing memory location,
> > > base_name()
> > > instead allocates new space. This is not a biggy, but we should keep it
> > > in
> > > mind to amend properly.
> > >
> > > lib/basename.c (base_name)
> > > --------------------------
> > >
> > > /* On systems with drive letters, "a/b:c" must return "./b:c" rather
> > >
> > > than "b:c" to avoid confusion with a drive letter. On systems
> > > with pure POSIX semantics, this is not an issue. */
> > >
> > > --------------------------
> > >
> > > Suggestions?
> >
> > ISSEP is "homebrewed" and incomplete but doesn't need a memory allocation.
> > base_name() is "complete" (the macros check more than just WINDOWS) and we
> > automatically get improvements from upstream - but it calls malloc().
> >
> > There is also last_component() which returns a pointer to the basename
> > within your filename. This is basically what you do.
> >
> > Anyways, this last component (basename) may still hold a device prefix -
> > you have to check that with either HAS_DEVICE() (only defined in certain
> > environments, needs to guarded by #ifdef) or by FILE_SYSTEM_PREFIX_LEN()
> > which gives 2 if your basename has a leading device prefix. And you
> > should do this check in a loop to catch names like 'C:D:xxx'. If you
> > don't do, we likely get a CVE assigned ;-)
>
> Thanks Tim! Yours is a super smart solution!
>
> I rewrote src/metalink.c (get_metalink_basename) to skip prefix drive
> letters on the basename (the declaration of last_component() is in
> src/metalink.h):
>
> #include "dosname.h"
>
> char *
> get_metalink_basename (char *name)
> {
> char *basename;
>
> if (!name)
> return NULL;
>
> basename = last_component (name);
>
> while (FILE_SYSTEM_PREFIX_LEN (basename))
> basename += 2;
>
> return metalink_check_safe_path (basename) ? basename : NULL;
> }
>
> [make syntax-check is ok, make check-valgrind is ok, contrib/check-hard is
> ok]
>
> WDYT?
Looks great !
To be absolutely future ready, don't assume FILE_SYSTEM_PREFIX_LEN to return 0
or 2 (even if the current code is like that).
while ((n = FILE_SYSTEM_PREFIX_LEN (basename)))
basename += n;
and you are on the safe side.
Regards, Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- [Bug-wget] [PATCH 09/25] Enforce Metalink file name verification, strip directory if necessary, Matthew White, 2016/09/10
- Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH 09/25] Enforce Metalink file name verification, strip directory if necessary, Tim Ruehsen, 2016/09/12
- Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH 09/25] Enforce Metalink file name verification, strip directory if necessary, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/12
- Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH 09/25] Enforce Metalink file name verification, strip directory if necessary, Tim Rühsen, 2016/09/12
- Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH 09/25] Enforce Metalink file name verification, strip directory if necessary, Matthew White, 2016/09/12
- Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH 09/25] Enforce Metalink file name verification, strip directory if necessary, Tim Ruehsen, 2016/09/13
- Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH 09/25] Enforce Metalink file name verification, strip directory if necessary, Matthew White, 2016/09/13
- Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH 09/25] Enforce Metalink file name verification, strip directory if necessary,
Tim Ruehsen <=
- Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH 09/25] Enforce Metalink file name verification, strip directory if necessary, Matthew White, 2016/09/13
- Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH 09/25] Enforce Metalink file name verification, strip directory if necessary, Matthew White, 2016/09/12
Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH 09/25] Enforce Metalink file name verification, strip directory if necessary, Matthew White, 2016/09/12