[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Security manager problem
From: |
Robert Lougher |
Subject: |
Re: Security manager problem |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Dec 2005 19:42:46 +0000 |
Hi,
On 12/6/05, Gary Benson <address@hidden> wrote:
> Anthony Green wrote:
> > It's been a long time since I've read anything about this kind of
> > stuff, but my understanding is that you simply wrap things like this
> > up in a AccessController.doPrivileged(), since the access control
> > context of the bootstrap or system class loader will permit file
> > I/O.
>
> That's interesting, as I was just looking at an some code in an
> AccessController.doPrivileged() that was doing security checks.
> Perhaps JamVM's AccessController.doPrivileged() is not in fact doing
> anything.
>
What version of JamVM are you using? As far as I'm aware, JamVMs
implementation of VMAccessController is complete (it was provided by
Casey Marshall, if I remember correctly). I've made some recent
changes to the native method that obtains the stack, so it _could_
have broken in 1.4.1.
Do you have a testcase?
Thanks,
Rob.
> Cheers,
> Gary
- Security manager problem, Gary Benson, 2005/12/06
- Re: Security manager problem, Anthony Green, 2005/12/06
- Re: Security manager problem, Gary Benson, 2005/12/06
- Re: Security manager problem,
Robert Lougher <=
- Re: Security manager problem, Gary Benson, 2005/12/07
- Re: Security manager problem, Gary Benson, 2005/12/12
- Re: Security manager problem, Mark Wielaard, 2005/12/13
- Re: Security manager problem, Gary Benson, 2005/12/22
Re: Security manager problem, Tom Tromey, 2005/12/06