[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6 |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Dec 2005 02:06:31 +0100 |
[Sorry for the duplicate message, trouble with my primary email account]
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 18:52 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Thanks. This seems to point out two things:
>
> 1) There is a huge allocation (2MB+):
> <GC: Alloc attempt for 2209016 bytes failed.>
> at this point in the code:
>
> // REVIEW: Using max instead of average may allocate a very large
> // buffer. Maybe we should do something more efficient?
> int remaining = in.remaining ();
> int n = (int) (remaining * maxBytesPerChar ());
> ByteBuffer out = ByteBuffer.allocate (n);
>
> I believe that REVIEW note gives us a hint :)
It gives us a hint (thanks for review help from Sven on irc) that we are
pushing huge Strings through the encoders. In particular gjdoc creates a
full String for each XHTMLified/pretty-printed/color-coded/etc source
file in HtmlDoclet.java. Although all the rest of the generated pages
are "streamed" to disk the actual source code formating is done in one
go:
String result = java2xhtml.makeHTML(sourceBuffer.getBuffer(),
sourceFile.getName());
Which is then written to disk in one go. For the larger source files
this can be pretty big. So a quick workaround for now would be to not
include the -linksource flag to gjdoc.
If someone wants a nice hacking task then they could look into making
java2xhtml take a Reader to read the source from and a HtmlPage to
output to instead of creating one huge String.
Cheers,
Mark
- memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6, Frederick C Druseikis, 2005/12/04
- Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6, Mark Wielaard, 2005/12/05
- Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6, Robert Lougher, 2005/12/05
- Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6, fredd, 2005/12/05
- Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6, Mark Wielaard, 2005/12/05
- Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6, Robert Lougher, 2005/12/05
- Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6, Robert Lougher, 2005/12/05
- Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6, Mark Wielaard, 2005/12/05
- Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6, Robert Lougher, 2005/12/05
- Re: memory behavior to expect with gjdoc-0.7.6,
Mark Wielaard <=