classpathx-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation


From: dog
Subject: Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:33:26 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i (Darwin)

dixit david-b:
> Isn't the point that the "activation" code should be used directly
> to process mailcaps?  As a rule, one doesn't want javax.* code
> to depend on any other package that's not called out by the API
> specs (e.g. java.* is OK, neither sun.* nor gnu.* would be).

fyi:

both the sun and the gnu javax.mail.* implementations rely on
implementation-specific (com.sun.* or gnu.*) utility streams that manage
transfer encoding schemes.

also the java-to-mime and mime-to-java charset mappings are held in a
separate resource in /META-INF outside the javax.* hierarchy.
-- 
dog
zx750-p5 sl-mille ukrmma#18
sol lucet omnibus ... praeter anglorum



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]