[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation
From: |
David Brownell |
Subject: |
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Dec 2001 14:46:07 -0800 |
> if it is deemed righteous we could put the stream classes into some
> javax.mail.io package. i didn't think we were allowed to add or subtract
> from the api though - if we were it would have been more sensible to
> create shared mime implementation support classes that could be used
> both by http and mail agents.
Oh, I certainly deem some stuff like that would have been
righteous for the JavaMail API designers! But you're right
that adding new "javax.*" packages (or puclic classes, methods,
fields, etc) is alleged (by Sun:) to be evil unless you're Sun.
I do seem to recall some criticism of that API as it happened,
much along the lines you sketched: "it would have been more
sensible..." to make a general purpose MIME classes rather
expect javax.mail.*, javax.servlet.*, and so on to each have
one more implementation. That's what a lot of people asked for
at the time, but I think the javax.mail.* people were focussed
on just their (primarily client side) part of the world.
- Dave