[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Classpathx-xml] AElfred2 conformance valid-not-sa-22
From: |
David Brownell |
Subject: |
Re: [Classpathx-xml] AElfred2 conformance valid-not-sa-22 |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:30:04 -0800 |
When you say "did not pass", what do you mean? That test
case is actually invalid...
The most current classification of the XML conformance tests
is at http://xmlconf.sourceforge.net in CVS, module xml/suite.
That's more correct than what's (still) on the OASIS/NIST site,
since the OASIS/NIST team hasn't really been actively fixing
bugs reported in that suite.
There, you'll see that the xmltest/xmltest.xml classification of
that test says that it's _invalid" because it violates a VC: the
"Proper Conditional Section/PE Nesting" VC, added in some
easily-overlooked erratum. (Maybe after the 2nd ed REC?)
I thought that AELfred2 actually implemented that VC now... :)
- Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Rafter" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:30 PM
Subject: [Classpathx-xml] AElfred2 conformance valid-not-sa-22
> I am now passing all of James Clark's validity tests except for
> valid-not-sa-22. I went back to Java and tried the ValidationConsumer with
> AElfred2 and it did not pass the test either. I am wondering if it is a
> valid document as it claims to be... additionally, I have stuck only to this
> suite for now... any recommendations on the next set?
>
> Thanks
> Jeff Rafter
> Defined Systems
> http://www.defined.net
> XML Development and Developer Web Hosting
>
>