[coreutils] [PATCH] tests: mention that btrfs also causes failure of misc/ls-time

[Jim Meyering]

FYI, I considered skipping this as a known bug,
but hear that it should be fixed "soon", so prefer
to continue to see the failure until it's resolved.

>From 0960e0c83d2a79d260f2b83bb273ed13ef5bbea1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:34:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] tests: mention that btrfs also causes failure of misc/ls-time

* tests/misc/ls-time: Mention that this test also fails on btrfs,
at least until http://bugzilla.redhat.com/591068 is addressed.
---
 tests/misc/ls-time |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/misc/ls-time b/tests/misc/ls-time
index beea159..60d43ac 100755
--- a/tests/misc/ls-time
+++ b/tests/misc/ls-time
@@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ else
   cat >&2 << \EOF
 failed ls ctime test -- this failure is expected at least for SunOS4.1.4
 and for tmpfs file systems on Solaris 5.5.1.
+It is also expected to fail on a btrfs file systems until
+http://bugzilla.redhat.com/591068 is fixed.

 In the output below, `c' should have had a ctime more recent than
 that of `a', but does not.
--
1.7.3.1.216.g329be