[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Best list where to post coreutils patches
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Best list where to post coreutils patches |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:21:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; ) |
[re-adding coreutils list]
On Saturday 18 June 2011, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
> > [off-list]
> >
> > On Saturday 18 June 2011, Jim Meyering wrote:
> >> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> >> > A tiny silly cosmetic patch.
> >> >
> >> > I post it here because I couldn't find a "coreutils-patches" list; I
> >> > hope it's ok, and if not, sorry in advance.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> coreutils@ is better for something trivial like this.
> >> Then we don't get an "issue" number in debbugs and
> >> we don't have to bother marking it as "done".
> >>
> > OK, I'll bear that in mind, thank you.
> >
> > BTW, is there any plan about introducing a 'coreutils-patches' list?
>
> No.
> You're also welcome to send patches to the bug-coreutils list,
> as documented in README-hacking:
>
> * Submitting patches
>
> If you develop a fix or a new feature, please send it to the
> appropriate bug-reporting address as reported by the --help option of
> each program.
>
> Questions like this are better posted to the mailing list.
>
OK, let's then make the answer public, at least :-)
> If you're asking it, odds are that you're not the only person
> who would benefit from a response.
>
> Keeping as much as possible in the open (i.e., on public mailing lists)
> is better for "community spirit", too:
>
> http://producingoss.com/en/setting-tone.html#avoid-private-discussions
>
Thanks, and sorry for the confusion.
Stefano
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Best list where to post coreutils patches,
Stefano Lattarini <=