[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] refactor expensive code in misc/stty [was: amendments to bac
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] refactor expensive code in misc/stty [was: amendments to backtick-removing series] |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:33:28 +0200 |
Bernhard Voelker wrote:
...
>> - case "$REV" in
>> - "")
>> - framework_failure_ "stty_reversible_settings() not called?";;
>> + case $stty_reversible_ in
>> + '')
>> + framework_failure_ "stty_reversible_init_() not called?";;
>> *" $1 "*)
>> return 0;;
>> *)
>
> You removed the double quotes around the case variable.
Yes. That was deliberate.
There is no need for double quotes there,
and in fact I consistently avoid them when the "case"
argument is a simple variable reference, since
they serve no purpose in that context.
Hmm... speaking of consistency,
git grep 'case "\$[a-z]*"' prints 16 lines.
Though that doesn't count things like case $(...),
which don't need double quotes, either.
Contrast that with the 124 matches for this:
git grep 'case \$'
> For whatever it is good for, I'd have a better feeling if they were
> there ... imagine something goes wrong during the perl processing.
> Maybe that's only my paranoia ;-)
>
> Apart from that, it looks good.
Pushed.
- Re: amendments to backtick-removing series, (continued)
- Re: amendments to backtick-removing series, Jim Meyering, 2012/04/04
- Re: amendments to backtick-removing series, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/04/04
- Re: amendments to backtick-removing series, Jim Meyering, 2012/04/04
- [PATCH] refactor expensive code in misc/stty [was: amendments to backtick-removing series], Bernhard Voelker, 2012/04/05
- Re: [PATCH] refactor expensive code in misc/stty [was: amendments to backtick-removing series], Jim Meyering, 2012/04/05
- Re: [PATCH] refactor expensive code in misc/stty [was: amendments to backtick-removing series], Bernhard Voelker, 2012/04/05
- Re: [PATCH] refactor expensive code in misc/stty [was: amendments to backtick-removing series], Jim Meyering, 2012/04/05
- Re: [PATCH] refactor expensive code in misc/stty [was: amendments to backtick-removing series], Bernhard Voelker, 2012/04/10
- Re: [PATCH] refactor expensive code in misc/stty [was: amendments to backtick-removing series], Jim Meyering, 2012/04/19
- Re: [PATCH] refactor expensive code in misc/stty [was: amendments to backtick-removing series], Bernhard Voelker, 2012/04/19
- Re: [PATCH] refactor expensive code in misc/stty [was: amendments to backtick-removing series],
Jim Meyering <=