[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Some question regarding tail and option "-c"
From: |
Philipp Thomas |
Subject: |
Re: Some question regarding tail and option "-c" |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Oct 2012 17:40:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
* Jim Meyering (address@hidden) [20121003 20:09]:
> I can reproduce that by specifying an older version of POSIX:
>
> $ : | _POSIX2_VERSION=0 tail -c 10
> tail: cannot open '10' for reading: No such file or directory
But AFAICS both 1003.2-1992 and 1003.2-2001 define the syntax as being »-c
number« i.e, with a blank between -c and the number but for 1003.2-1992 tail
only accepts -c<number> . With POSIX2_VERSION=199209 tail accepts »-n 10«,
so why doesn't -c accept a blank between option and number?
Philipp
- Some question regarding tail and option "-c", Robert Milasan, 2012/10/03
- Re: Some question regarding tail and option "-c", Bob Proulx, 2012/10/03
- Re: Some question regarding tail and option "-c", Robert Milasan, 2012/10/03
- Re: Some question regarding tail and option "-c", Jim Meyering, 2012/10/03
- Re: Some question regarding tail and option "-c", Robert Milasan, 2012/10/04
- Re: Some question regarding tail and option "-c", Jim Meyering, 2012/10/04
- Re: Some question regarding tail and option "-c", Robert Milasan, 2012/10/04
- Re: Some question regarding tail and option "-c", Jim Meyering, 2012/10/04
- Re: Some question regarding tail and option "-c", Philipp Thomas, 2012/10/05
- Re: Some question regarding tail and option "-c",
Philipp Thomas <=
- Re: Some question regarding tail and option "-c", Jim Meyering, 2012/10/09