[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Make mv work better with SELinux.
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: Make mv work better with SELinux. |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:32:35 +0200 |
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 10/09/2012 08:54 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> On 10/08/2012 09:24 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
...
>> [in a follow-up]
>>> Thinking further, --context without an option, is not too clear to the
>>> user. They might think they were copying the original context rather than
>>> setting a new context.
>>
>>> Pity the long option wasn't called --new-context. I suppose we could have
>>> that as an alias for --context and deprecate the former?
>>
>> Sounds reasonable. Adjust the other --context=CTX commands, mkdir, mkfifo,
>> mknod at the same time.
>
> I just want to make sure that you guys are expecting a patch from me?
I am. That'd be great, especially if you can add NEWS entries
and tests to exercise the new code.
- Make mv work better with SELinux., Daniel J Walsh, 2012/10/08
- Re: Make mv work better with SELinux., Pádraig Brady, 2012/10/08
- Re: Make mv work better with SELinux., Pádraig Brady, 2012/10/08
- Re: Make mv work better with SELinux., Jim Meyering, 2012/10/09
- Re: Make mv work better with SELinux., Daniel J Walsh, 2012/10/16
- Re: Make mv work better with SELinux.,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: Make mv work better with SELinux., Daniel J Walsh, 2012/10/19
- Re: Make mv work better with SELinux., Jim Meyering, 2012/10/20
- Make coretutils work better with SELinux., Daniel J Walsh, 2012/10/30
- Re: Make coretutils work better with SELinux., Pádraig Brady, 2012/10/31