[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 3/3] doc: mention `numfmt` as an alternative to `sort -h`
|
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 3/3] doc: mention `numfmt` as an alternative to `sort -h` |
|
Date: |
Mon, 04 Mar 2013 01:37:56 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
On 03/04/2013 01:18 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Good point.
>
> s/posibly/possibly/,
>
> but you might prefer to word it like this:
>
> numbers to human format @emph{after} the sort, thus often allowing
> sort to operate on more accurate numbers.
>
Amended with that.
thanks!
Pádraig.