[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2] build: Option for building all tools in a single binary
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2] build: Option for building all tools in a single binary |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:58:40 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.13.1 (Linux/3.14.2; KDE/4.13.1; x86_64; ; ) |
> --- a/Makefile.am
> +++ b/Makefile.am
>
> +# If we are building a single-binary, create symlinks for them when
installing.
> +install-exec-hook:
> + $(AM_V_at)for i in $(single_binary_progs); do \
> + rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/$$i$(EXEEXT); \
> + $(LN_S) -s coreutils$(EXEEXT) $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/$$i$(EXEEXT);\
> + done
i think you need `|| exit $$?` after the rm & ln statements since this doesn't
run in set -e mode
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/src/coreutils-arch.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +#include <config.h>
> +#include "system.h"
each of these stub files need a one line blurb/copyright/license comment
block. see kill.c as an example.
> +/* Ensure that the main for uname is declared even if the tool is not being
> + * build in this single-binary. */
GNU style says to omit the * at the start of line, and two spaces after the
period.
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/src/coreutils.c
>
> +/* coreutils.c aggregates the functionality of every other tool into a
single
> + binary multiplexed by the value of argv[0]. This is enabled by passing
two spaces after the period
> + By Alex Deymo <address@hidden> */
two spaces at the end, and a period.
> +/* Declare the main() function on each one of the selected tools. This name
GNU style says to just use main -- omit the ().
> + if (STREQ (prog_name, "coreutils"))
> + {
> + prog_argv++;
GNU style says to indent the braces with two spaces
if (...)
{
...
}
> + prog_name = prog_argv[0]; /* Don't use last_component() in this case.
*/
i think the preference is to not do inline comments, so move it to above
> + /* Only print the "program not found" message when no options have been
> + * passed to coreutils. */
> + if (optind == 1 && prog_name && !STREQ (prog_name, "coreutils"))
> + printf ("%s: program not found.\n", prog_name);
shouldn't this write to stderr w/fprintf ?
how about the message also taking the form:
coreutils: program not found: foo
> --- a/src/local.mk
> +++ b/src/local.mk
>
> +src/coreutils_symlinks:
> + $(AM_V_GEN)touch $@
> + $(AM_V_at)for i in $(single_binary_progs); do \
> + rm -f $(top_srcdir)/src/$$i$(EXEEXT); \
> + $(LN_S) -s coreutils$(EXEEXT) $(top_srcdir)/src/$$i$(EXEEXT); \
> + done
> +
> +clean-local:
> + rm -f src/coreutils_symlinks
> + $(AM_V_at)for i in $(single_binary_progs); do \
> + rm -f $(top_srcdir)/src/$$i$(EXEEXT); \
> + done
same comment wrt `|| exit $$?`
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- [PATCH v2] build: Option for building all tools in a single binary, Alex Deymo, 2014/06/09
- Re: [PATCH v2] build: Option for building all tools in a single binary, Pádraig Brady, 2014/06/10
- Re: [PATCH v2] build: Option for building all tools in a single binary, Alex Deymo, 2014/06/11
- Re: [PATCH v2] build: Option for building all tools in a single binary, Pádraig Brady, 2014/06/12
- Re: [PATCH v2] build: Option for building all tools in a single binary, Alex Deymo, 2014/06/13
- Re: [PATCH v2] build: Option for building all tools in a single binary, Alex Deymo, 2014/06/16
- Re: [PATCH v2] build: Option for building all tools in a single binary, Pádraig Brady, 2014/06/16
- Re: [PATCH v2] build: Option for building all tools in a single binary, Alex Deymo, 2014/06/17
- Re: [PATCH v2] build: Option for building all tools in a single binary, Alex Deymo, 2014/06/19
- Re: [PATCH v2] build: Option for building all tools in a single binary,
Mike Frysinger <=
- Re: [PATCH v2] build: Option for building all tools in a single binary, Alex Deymo, 2014/06/20
- Re: [PATCH v2] build: Option for building all tools in a single binary, Bernhard Voelker, 2014/06/19
- Re: [PATCH v2] build: Option for building all tools in a single binary, Bernhard Voelker, 2014/06/19
- Re: [PATCH v2] build: Option for building all tools in a single binary, Alex Deymo, 2014/06/20
- Re: [PATCH v2] build: Option for building all tools in a single binary, Pádraig Brady, 2014/06/20
- Re: [PATCH v2] build: Option for building all tools in a single binary, Mike Frysinger, 2014/06/20