[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Document for + seems to be missing in ls' document
From: |
Ray Dillinger |
Subject: |
Re: Document for + seems to be missing in ls' document |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:37:40 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.4.0 |
On 03/12/2015 01:49 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> It's easy
> to use help2man to generate man pages from --help output, but I don't
> know of any good conversion from texinfo to man. So the man page ends
> up being as concise as --help output, while including a pointer to the
> full documentation.
Hello! Does the fact that you CANNOT pipe the texinfo pages through
a filter or a pager to easily format as man pages, somehow fail to
indicate to you that they are in fact LESS USEFUL than man pages,
precisely because the damn texinfo format doesn't play nice with
Unix command line tools?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Document for + seems to be missing in ls' document, Peng Yu, 2015/03/11
- Re: Document for + seems to be missing in ls' document, Eric Blake, 2015/03/11
- Re: Document for + seems to be missing in ls' document, Peng Yu, 2015/03/11
- Re: Document for + seems to be missing in ls' document, Eric Blake, 2015/03/11
- Re: Document for + seems to be missing in ls' document, Mike Hodson, 2015/03/12
- Re: Document for + seems to be missing in ls' document, Eric Blake, 2015/03/12
- Re: Document for + seems to be missing in ls' document, Eric Blake, 2015/03/12
- Re: Document for + seems to be missing in ls' document, Bernhard Voelker, 2015/03/12
- Re: Document for + seems to be missing in ls' document,
Ray Dillinger <=
- RE: Document for + seems to be missing in ls' document, William Bader, 2015/03/12
- Re: Document for + seems to be missing in ls' document, Peng Yu, 2015/03/13
- Re: Document for + seems to be missing in ls' document, Ray Dillinger, 2015/03/12