[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:21:59 +0000 |
I don't know if this is relevant:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download at:
>
> http://download.gnome.org/sources/gtk+/2.20/
> ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/2.20/
[snip]
>
> GTK+ 2.20 adds new functionality while maintaining source and binary
> compatibility with GTK+ 2.18...
It might be worth adding that while GTK+ 2.20 is the latest in the
"stable" GTK stream, it has a dependency on the "unstable" GLib
2.23.
Allin Cottrell
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 15:14 +0100, Nils Gey wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:19:38 +0000
> Richard Shann <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > I think we can be reasonably sure that it is not the denemo sources that
> > have triggered this bug by changing. If you can re-build from the denemo
> > sources of 21st I think you will see the bug.
> >
> > I suspect gub is using a new version of glib with a bug, or at least
> > new behavior exposing a bug in denemo's code.
>
> Gub does not build everything from git or svn. The opposite is true: Most are
> just stable releases. This is the case for any glib related lib, too. The
> main things that change are Denemo and Lilypond.
>
>
> > The basic problem is that gub can (AFAIK) change the versions of tools
> > it uses and of libraries it uses and make a new installer incorporating
> > new things other than a new denemo. Uncontrollable behavior like this is
> > a bad thing.
> > Richard
>
> Like I said. Its not that uncontrollable.
> So in this case I highly suspect Lilypond. We need to build from a stable
> release in any case. Building Lilypond from git to release Denemo is still
> not a good idea.
>
> So the next step is to rewind lilypond or, in the best case, use stable .12
> until .14 comes out and then carefully check whats new.
>
> Nils
>
>
>
> >
> > On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 22:31 +0100, Nils Gey wrote:
> > > My memory was not wrong! On sunday it still worked (for me)
> > >
> > > On Sunday the 21th I gubbed and installed a version, still labeled 0.8.15
> > > and installed it on my laptop which had a fresh Windows 7 version on it.
> > > Print Preview / PDF Generation works there.
> > >
> > > It can be downloaded here:
> > > http://www.nilsgey.de/denemo-0.8.15-20100321.exe
> > >
> > > Nils
> > >
> > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:00:34 +0000
> > > Richard Shann <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 09:03 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
> > > > > I have built using the my old gub, and Nils' findings apply to this
> > > > > also: the .pdf file is created with zero length, but lilypond does not
> > > > > start until denemo exits, whereon the .pdf file is populated.
> > > > > So this is *not* a bug caused by Nils' new gub code.
> > > > > It seems the bug is because the code which generates a new name for
> > > > > each
> > > > > print during a denemo session has been disabled. I'll look into it.
> > > >
> > > > Despite disabling all touching of the output pdf by denemo, the lilypond
> > > > process still refuses it progress beyond getting itself installed in the
> > > > process table (or whatever Windows has - it is in the list of processes
> > > > in the task manager, but does not consume cpu until denemo exits).
> > > > I did the experiment of launching a 0.8.15 in this same environment, ie
> > > > in the installation that I have made from todays sources. That
> > > > executable does not set LilyPond's path, so it has to be set outside,
> > > > but once that is done the lilypond executable does run to completion
> > > > without waiting for denemo to quit.
> > > > I am bemused.
> > > > Richard
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Richard
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 21:54 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
> > > > > > OK I have set all these up and checked the code into git.
> > > > > > One incomplete feature is that the GUILE_LOAD_PATH is
> > > > > > over-written, as
> > > > > > we have to be sure that the denemo scm files are in it. But this
> > > > > > would
> > > > > > mean that we would get the newer lilypond scm files if someone had
> > > > > > already set GUILE_LOAD_PATH to an older installation of lilypond and
> > > > > > wished to use it.
> > > > > > LilyPond failing to run until Denemo exits would make sense if
> > > > > > Denemo
> > > > > > still had the .ly file open, as windows does file locking (I
> > > > > > think). But
> > > > > > why this should show now I can't imagine.
> > > > > > A useful test would be to install LilyPond system wide as well as
> > > > > > inside
> > > > > > Denemo and see if the same holds.
> > > > > > Richard
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 21:40 +0100, Nils Gey wrote:
> > > > > > > > Actually the push failed, and I will delay while further
> > > > > > > > investigations
> > > > > > > > take place
> > > > > > > > Richard
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Investigation Complete:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I finally got all lilypond enviroment variables right to run
> > > > > > > lilypond standalone and produce a valid pdf file.
> > > > > > > We need to copy this in Denemo.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > GUILE_LOAD
> > >
> > > _PATH:
> > > > > > > ...\denemo\usr\share\guile
> > > > > > > ...\denemo\usr\share\guile\1.8
> > > > > > > ...\denemo\usr\share\lilypond\current\scm //if we build lilypond
> > > > > > > git, its "current"
> > > > > > > ...\denemo\usr\share\guile
> > > > > > > ...\denemo\usr\share\guile
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > PATH:
> > > > > > > ...\denemo\usr\bin
> > > > > > > ...\denemo\usr\lib
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > LILYPOND_DATA_PATH
> > > > > > > ...\denemo\usr\share\lilypond\current\
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > LILYPOND_VERBOSE
> > > > > > > 1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > this last one is actually not needed, but may be nice for future
> > > > > > > testing.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Problems remain, two are just to inform you, the third is the
> > > > > > > real one:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1)PDFs show up from where path\to\lilypond.exe was invoked.
> > > > > > > Means: The current working dir.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2)Running lilypond from the command line has problems. Maybe
> > > > > > > backslash\
> > > > > > > escaping problems.
> > > > > > > janneke: "and no-one uses the command line, apparently ;-)"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you place the .ly file to the dir in %PATH% it works. And it
> > > > > > > works, if you do it with a file association, that means the
> > > > > > > console it the reason that it does not work (thats why I think
> > > > > > > its some escaping problem)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > BUT (good news) from within Denemo these last two problems are no
> > > > > > > problems. The file gets generated and ends in the right place.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3)However the ly/pdf file does not gets processed until Denemo is
> > > > > > > closed. Don't ask me, I don't know why...
> > > > > > > You see the lilypond terminal open all the time, but nothing
> > > > > > > happens, and if you quit Denemo the processing begins and the pdf
> > > > > > > is right there.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nils
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > > > > > address@hidden
> > > > > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > > > > address@hidden
> > > > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> > > >
> >
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, (continued)
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, Richard Shann, 2010/03/23
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, Nils Gey, 2010/03/23
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, Richard Shann, 2010/03/23
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, Richard Shann, 2010/03/24
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, Richard Shann, 2010/03/24
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, Richard Shann, 2010/03/24
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, Nils Gey, 2010/03/24
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, Richard Shann, 2010/03/25
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, Nils Gey, 2010/03/25
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, Richard Shann, 2010/03/25
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status,
Richard Shann <=
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, Richard Shann, 2010/03/25
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, Richard Shann, 2010/03/25
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, Richard Shann, 2010/03/26
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, Richard Shann, 2010/03/26
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, Jeremiah Benham, 2010/03/26
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, Richard Shann, 2010/03/26
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, Jeremiah Benham, 2010/03/26
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 0.8.16 - Gub Status, Jeremiah Benham, 2010/03/26