Re: which license? bsd or modified bsd or copyright?

[address@hidden]

>yes, major issue. hence, the query:)

Maybe consider deleting the entry and/or adding some sort of freedom flaw warning.

---

From: directory-discuss <directory-discuss-bounces+knowledgeofnations=outlook.com@gnu.org> on behalf of a^gyaanapan <givian@dismail.de>
Sent: Wednesday, June 9, 2021 5:47 PM
To: directory-discuss@gnu.org <directory-discuss@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: which license? bsd or modified bsd or copyright?

 

June 9, 2021 10:20 PM, "bill-auger" <bill-auger@peers.community> wrote:

> any inaccurate information in the directory could be updated -
> that is precisely how the entry can remain relevant and useful -
> if some change is truly minor, then it would not affect the
> usefulness of the entry - if some change affects the usefulness
> of the entry, then it is not a minor change - either way, it
> never hurts to keep things up-to-date
its good to know. i can proceed thoroughly.

> in this case, i do not see any incorrect information though -
> the license in the github repo is the same as the one in the
> sourceforge tarball; and the FSD entry does not even mention a
> license
yes, major issue. hence, the query :)


( ^ ) ( ^ ) ( ^ ) ( ^ ) ( ^ ) ( ^ )
non interactive: agyaanapan.neocities.org
interactive: @agyaanapan@social.linux.pizza