[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP and RFX2400 block diagrams
From: |
Eric Blossom |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP and RFX2400 block diagrams |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:37:21 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:28:33PM -0400, Lee Patton wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 06:56 +0000, Eric Blossom wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 10:08:47PM -0400, Lee Patton wrote:
> > > I've taken a shot at coming up with block diagrams for the USRP and
> > > RFX2400. The diagram for the USRP is the result of information I've
> > > gleaned from different messages in the list, data sheets, and block
> > > diagrams created by other GNU Radio users (specifically, Achilleas
> > > Anastasopoulos). The RFX2400 diagram was created from Matt's drawings
> > > and associated data sheets.
> > >
> > > The diagrams can be found here:
> > > http://www.pattoncentral.org/gnuradio/diagram/
> >
> > Nice diagrams! Thanks!
>
> Glad to.
>
> > Here are a couple of tweaks:
> >
> > The digital down-conversion should show a single complex multiplier
> > instead of two real multipliers.
>
> Thanks. I'll make the change. A complex multiplier is just a more
> efficient digital version of what I've drawn, right?
No. They're not equivalent. The naive complex multiplier has 4 real
mulitipliers and two adders:
(a + bj) * (c + dj) = (ac - bd) + (ad + bc)j
> > Same comment on the digital up-conversion. We've got "Block D"
> > enabled in the AD9862, thus it's functioning as a complex multiplier.
>
> Okay. Out of curiosity, is "Block B" enabled too?
Yes, if it needs to be.
Eric