Re: Suggestion: Move portaudio out of GNUstep-gui

[Adam Fedor]

Yen-Ju Chen wrote:
>  I'm not against portaudio.
>  I only feel it makes more sense that portaduio will be
>  an external library as libtiff than in the GNUstep-gui source code.
>  Since ./configure can detect portaudio,
>  functionally there is no difference,
>  but it minimize the chance that people complain
>  they can't compile GNUstep-gui due to portaudio.
>  And GNUstep don't need to maintain this library
>  in order to make it compile.
>  PortAudio project already maintain it.

Sounds like a fine idea. Can someelse take charge of doing this and 
submitting patches? It doesn't really work on my machine and I haven't 
had time to fiddle with it, so I can't really test anything.


--
Adam Fedor, Digital Optics Corp.      | I'm glad I hate spinach, because
http://www.doc.com                    | if I didn't, I'd eat it, and you
                                      | know how I hate the stuff.