[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next round: gnustep website proposal
From: |
Richard Stonehouse |
Subject: |
Re: next round: gnustep website proposal |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:46:42 -0000 |
I'm no design expert and I know a lot of these things are personal taste
- but, for my money, I'm afraid that I, too, prefer the design of the
old site over the new ones.
The things that strike me in the latest three versions are:
- a rather dense, intimidating block of text
that seems visually unattractive - doesn't
really make me want to read it (especially
in the darker coloured versions);
- problems in picking out the headings because
they don't seem to be distinguished from
normal text, also lack of clear separation
between articles;
- problems in picking up paragraph breaks
because of lack of inter-paragraph spacing;
- problems in picking up sentence starts
because of lack of normal capitalisation
(am I being a fuddy-duddy)?
- a lack of highlighted points that the lazy
reader (like me!) can pick up in a quick
scan (see some of Jakob Nielsen's AlertBox
articles).
Viewing in Opera 6.05 under Linux.
I wonder if the fundamental problem is simply that there's such a lot of
information on the page? With less, it would be possible to give the
items a bit more "air" around them, making it more attractive and easier
to read.
--
Richard Stonehouse
- next round: gnustep website proposal, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2002/10/21
- Re: next round: gnustep website proposal, Pascal Bourguignon, 2002/10/21
- Re: next round: gnustep website proposal, Banlu Kemiyatorn, 2002/10/22
- Re: next round: gnustep website proposal, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/10/22
- Re: next round: gnustep website proposal, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2002/10/22
- Re: next round: gnustep website proposal, Pete French, 2002/10/22