Re: Problems with latest back and base

[Adam Fedor]

I put a check in configure to look for this. I don't think that's a 
great solution. It seems like we should be able to deal without it, but 
I don't know that much about GL.

Stephen Brandon wrote:
> Did anyone ever resolve this? I have the same problem - brand new checkout 
> from GNUstep, and a glx.h that is quite clearly v1.3.  It does not contain 
> the define for GLX_RGBA_TYPE. The assumption that it should contain 
> GLX_RGBA_TYPE based on the version 1.3, seems to be mistaken.
>
> Cheers,
> Stephen Brandon
>
>
> On Monday 25 November 2002 11:21, Andreas Heppel wrote:
>
> > On 2002-11-25 11:45:10 +0100 Frederic De Jaeger <dejaeger@free.fr> wrote:
> >
> > > Andreas> Hi,
> > > Andreas> I have a problem compiling gnustep-back 0.8.3. The compiler
> > > complains
> > > Andreas> about not knowing the symbol  GLX_RGBA_TYPE in x11/XGGLContext.m
> > > Andreas> Digging aroung in my system showed that this name was defined in
> > > Andreas> GL/glxext.h, but it seems to be the wrong version. What do I
> > > need Andreas> here? Can OpenGL support be switched off somehow? Did I
> > > miss any Andreas> recommended reading?
> > >
> > > It means that your header (glx.h) is an old version ( <= 1.2 ).
> > > The configure script should check the version of the header.
> > > Currently, it doesn't.  I will fix it in the cvs.
> >
> > Thanks. Which version do I have to use then? I have checked and it looks
> > like I have version 1.3 here. At least there is a define GLX_VERSION_1_3
> > set to 1.

--
Adam Fedor, Digital Optics Corp.      | I'm glad I hate spinach, because
http://www.doc.com                    | if I didn't, I'd eat it, and you
                                      | know how I hate the stuff.