[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
From: |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
Subject: |
Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases |
Date: |
25 Jan 2005 16:13:50 +0100 |
Adrian Robert <arobert@cogsci.ucsd.edu> writes:
[...]
| What about splitting gcc into two branches, a "high performance"
| branch, where heavy optimization takes place, and a "completeness"
| branch, where the priority is on platform and language support.
| Releases come off both branches: C, C++, maybe Fortran support on
| the performance branch, and all languages on the other.
IMO, that would be an effective misuse of our already limited
resources. However, anybody is free to branch off GCC mainline.
--
Gabriel Dos Reis
gdr@integrable-solutions.net
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, (continued)
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Steven Bosscher, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Helge Hess, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Joe Buck, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Nicola Pero, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Steven Bosscher, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Nicola Pero, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Mark Mitchell, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Daniel Berlin, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Daniel Berlin, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Anthony Juckel, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases,
Gabriel Dos Reis <=
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Joe Buck, 2005/01/25
Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Daniel Berlin, 2005/01/24
Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Joe Buck, 2005/01/25
Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Sébastien Pierre, 2005/01/31