[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:27:36 +0000 (GMT) |
> Hello there !
>
> Just my 2c, but why not consider using something like POC
> <http://users.pandora.be/stes/compiler.html>, it allows to use ObjC
> with C++, is reasonably well coded and is also quite portable. You
> could then use GCC or better (like LLVM) as a back-end.
If POC supported the GNU Objective-C runtime and the Objective-C syntax /
semantics that we use, we might use it. Why not.
But the author has implemented a different language than the one we use,
and wants to keep it that way, which he is obviously entitled to do, so we
can not use it.
--
Hoping I've been neutral enough to avoid the usual POC triggered flamewar
but I somewhat suspect my hopes won't last ... ;-)
Thanks anyway
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, (continued)
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Nicola Pero, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Mark Mitchell, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Daniel Berlin, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Daniel Berlin, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Anthony Juckel, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Joe Buck, 2005/01/25
Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Daniel Berlin, 2005/01/24
Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Joe Buck, 2005/01/25
Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Sébastien Pierre, 2005/01/31
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases,
Nicola Pero <=