[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: So, honestly, is GNUStep a viable development option?
From: |
markjoel60 |
Subject: |
Re: So, honestly, is GNUStep a viable development option? |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:03:56 -0800 (PST) |
Very well-reasoned -- and one of the main reasons I didn't want to go off and
start one without consensus... Scattering information would be a very bad
thing.
FWIW, it can be a link off of the new web page, certainly, since most people
who are interested in GNUStep end up there anyway.
http://www.gnustep.org/forum is pretty intuitive, I think.
Also, the following domain's are available:
GNUSteppers.com, GNUSteppers.org
GNUStepper.com, GNUStepper.org
In case you want something that sort of has a "marketing" feel to it...
Nicola Pero-4 wrote:
>
>
>> Having both is certainly a good thing, by only having one of the two
>> you lock out quite a percentage of the other group. [and this doesn't
>> mean that mailing list guys need to support forums, just having a
>> forum for forums users is a good thing :-)]
>
> I support the idea of an "official GNUstep forum". :-)
>
> It generally seems like a good idea - particularly for new users who
> want to browse information and discussions. :-)
>
> And it's not "either mailing lists or a forum", as you say we can have
> both. We can keep most developer discussions on mailing lists, but also
> have a forum which we ("mailing list guys") visit from time to time
> (depending on personal taste) but where the "forum users" can discuss
> happily. ;-)
>
> Finally, if we don't create an "official GNUstep forum" I imagine we'll
> just end up with many GNUstep forums. Starting a forum is quite easy
> and there seem to be people that are really keen on it, so the obvious
> consequence is that they will start GNUstep forums ... probably more
> than one, in competition. That would be bad because then the material
> gets fragmented. It would seem much better to just start an "official"
> one :-)
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/So%2C-honestly%2C-is-GNUStep-a-viable-development-option--tf4795771.html#a13775610
Sent from the GNUstep - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: So, honestly, is GNUStep a viable development option?, (continued)
- Re: So, honestly, is GNUStep a viable development option?, Gregory John Casamento, 2007/11/13
- Re: So, honestly, is GNUStep a viable development option?, Gregory John Casamento, 2007/11/14
- Re: So, honestly, is GNUStep a viable development option?, Gregory John Casamento, 2007/11/14
- Re: So, honestly, is GNUStep a viable development option?, Daniel J Farrell, 2007/11/14
- Re: So, honestly, is GNUStep a viable development option?, Nicola Pero, 2007/11/14
- Re: So, honestly, is GNUStep a viable development option?, Gregory John Casamento, 2007/11/15
- Re: So, honestly, is GNUStep a viable development option?, Gregory John Casamento, 2007/11/15
- Re: So, honestly, is GNUStep a viable development option?, Gregory John Casamento, 2007/11/15
- Re: So, honestly, is GNUStep a viable development option?, Jesse Ross, 2007/11/15
- Re: So, honestly, is GNUStep a viable development option?, David Chisnall, 2007/11/15
- Re: So, honestly, is GNUStep a viable development option?, Stefan Bidigaray, 2007/11/15
- Re: So, honestly, is GNUStep a viable development option?, Gregory John Casamento, 2007/11/15