Re: LLVM

[Andrew Pinski]

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 1, 2008, at 0:10, Tim McIntosh <tmcintos@avalon.net> wrote:
> > >
> Hmm...really?  I haven't been following this too closely, but that's  
> not the impression I got from Steve Naroff's presentation (http://llvm.org/devmtg/2007-05/09-Naroff-CFE.mov 
> ).  So it didn't have anything to do with working with a  
> maintainable and modular code base, issuing better diagnostics,  
> providing better IDE integration, having the ability to create non- 
> fat universal binaries, or post-link-time optimization?  Maybe I'm  
> just not skeptical enough.

Considering Steve wrote the objective-c front-end for gcc, I would not  
trust anything he says about maintable code or any thing about clang  
or LLVM. I would in fact say he has been anti GPL since the begining  
and this is his way to get back at the FSF.

-- Pinski