[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: QuantumSTEP vs. iPhone SDK
From: |
Nicolas Roard |
Subject: |
Re: QuantumSTEP vs. iPhone SDK |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:18:15 +0000 |
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
<hns@computer.org> wrote:
>
> Am 07.03.2008 um 17:03 schrieb Nicolas Roard:
>
>
>
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
> > <hns@computer.org> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> I guess after the announcement of the iPhone SDK, most of you are now
> >> interested in a comparison between QuantumSTEP and the iPhone SDK.
> >> Therefore, I have made a table that you can see here:
> >>
> >> http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/QuantumSTEP_vs_iPhoneSDK
> >>
> >> Comments, corrections, questions are welcome!
> >>
> >
> > Installed Base (E2008) 10k ... 1 Mio
> >
> >
> > Really ?!
>
> I simply don't know real figures. The basis counted here is the
> OpenMoko device for which estimates range from 5000 units to Millions.
> Well, QuantumSTEP is not installed on them initially but can be. So I
> consider the device deployment as "installed base".
Hm, you probably should choose another name than installed base then,
that's rather misleading.
--
Nicolas Roard
"Java, the best argument for Smalltalk since C++ " -- Frank Winkler