Re: image browser application

[Omniscient]

On May 7, 7:42 am, Zhang Weiwu <zhangwe...@realss.com> wrote:

> Hi. Thanks for introducing this software. It seems lacking features
> normal user expect from an image browser, e.g. print an image. Again
> maybe in GNUStep the concept is different, e.g. one application does
> only one thing, if it prints image it call services from an image viewer
> like Preview.app, is it right?

Services are good but there is no such concept that apps _should_ be
doing
only one thing. Its purpose is for making flexibility in setting up
simple work flows
and speeding up the development.

Some operation can be separated into a few, in some complex operations
you can't,
Rather waste memory and CPU time starting an app just to use its
services,
directly linking a framework could be far less expensive, and of
course less flexible.